Discovery and Development of a Potent LIMK2 Isoform-Specific Degrader
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The LIM kinases (LIMK1/2) are key mediators in signaling cascades that regulate actin cytoskeleton dynamics via cofilin phosphorylation. Dysregulation of these pathways and overexpression of LIMKs are implicated in disease development, including cancer, Fragile X syndrome, and glaucoma. Positioned downstream of actin-regulating Rho GTPase signaling pathways, LIM kinases are attractive drug targets. Here, we targeted LIMKs with PROTACs to disrupt both catalytically and noncatalytically mediated functions. Despite employing a dual LIMK1/2 inhibitor warhead and high structural conservation between the two human LIM kinases, we discovered isoform-specific LIMK2 degradation by initial PROTACs that we optimized into a highly potent and selective LIMK2 degrader. Cell-based assays and structural analysis indicated that isoform specificity was likely driven by favorable orientation bias and/or lysine accessibility, along with enhanced ternary complex formation. We comprehensively characterized the PROTAC as a chemical probe that induces isoform-specific degradation, offering a powerful alternative to conventional reversible pan-LIMK inhibitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".