MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413949684 · doi:10.1099/mic.0.001596

Role of AprA and pyocyanin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa on Staphylococcus aureus tolerance to silver

2025· article· en· W4413949684 on OpenAlexafffund
Jakob Gorodetsky, Nadia K. Monych, Raymond J. Turner, Omid Haji‐Ghassemi, Sean C. Booth

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPyocyaninPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusMicrobiologyVirulenceBiologyPathogenHuman pathogenBacteriaGeneGeneticsQuorum sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The opportunistic pathogens Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are often found together causing persistent infections where they exhibit complex interactions that affect their virulence and resistance to treatment. We sought to clarify how interactions between these organisms affect their resistance to the antimicrobial metal silver (AgNO3). As previous work showed that cell-free supernatant from P. aeruginosa enhances the resistance of S. aureus, we aimed to identify the exact factor(s) responsible for this increase. Using molecular weight cutoff filters and proteomics, we identified the protein AprA and pyocyanin as the responsible factors. Transposon-mediated disruption of aprA led to the production of supernatant which could not enhance the silver tolerance of S. aureus. These findings suggest that the protease AprA from P. aeruginosa plays an important role in increasing the tolerance of S. aureus to AgNO3 via in part by mediating the levels of pyocyanin which in turn reduces Ag2+ to detoxify it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobiologySame topicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingFrench-language works237,207