Cosmology, new entropy and thermodynamics of apparent horizon
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a new nonadditive entropy of the apparent horizon S K = S B H / ( 1 + γ S B H 2 ) , where S B H is the Bekenstein–Hawking (BH) entropy and consider the description of a new cosmology. When parameter γ vanishes ( γ → 0 ) our entropy S K is converted into BH entropy S B H . By using the holographic principle a new model of holographic dark energy is studied. We obtain the generalised Friedmann equations for Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) space-time for the barotropic matter fluid with the equation of state (EoS) p = w ρ . From the second modified Friedmann equation we find a dynamical cosmological constant. The density of the dark energy ρ D , pressure p D , and the deceleration parameter q corresponding to our model are computed. It is shown that at some EoS parameter w and the entropy parameter γ there are phases of universe acceleration, deceleration and eternal inflation. Our model, with the help of the holographic principle, can describe the universe inflation and late time of the universe acceleration. We show that the current deceleration parameter q 0 ≈ − 0.535 is realized at some model parameters. Entropic cosmology with our entropy proposed is equivalent to cosmology based on the teleparallel gravity with the function F ( T ) . The generalised entropy of the apparent horizon with the holographic dark energy model can be of interest for new cosmology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it