MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Investigation of flax plant residue degradation processes under controlled laboratory conditions

2025· article· en· W4413953499 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAgrarian science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicVaried Academic Research Topics
Canadian institutionsDebiopharm Group (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidue (chemistry)Degradation (telecommunications)Environmental sciencePulp and paper industryBiochemical engineeringWaste managementChemistryEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effectiveness of enzymatic preparations based on cellulase, xylanase, alpha-amylase and pectinase activities for accelerating the decomposition of difficult-to-decompose flax plant residues during their incorporation into the soil or distribution on the surface was studied. The study was conducted in 2023 in the testing laboratory of phytodiagnostics and agrochemistry of АО “Agrodoktor”. The destruction of crop and root residues was assessed by the weight method, and the fractional composition of the undecomposed residues was determined by sieving through a sieve of different diameters. The dependence of decomposition intensity on the localization of crop residues in the soil or on its surface was revealed. When embedded in the soil, the best results were achieved using cellulase (+15.2% of the control), alpha-amylase (up to +16.7%) and pectinase (up to +27.7%). However, when distributing plant residues over the surface, the highest degradation rate was observed with the use of xylanase (+13.2%). The study revealed differences in the fractional composition of the crop and root residues of flax after the period of destruction. When distributing plant residues over the soil surface, the highest level of mineralization was recorded for variants using pectinase and xylanase, the percentage of plant residues that did not pass through a 6 mm sieve was 33.6 and 39.4, respectively, while the indicators for cellulase and amylase were at the control level of 45.3%. In the case of embedding plant residues in the soil, it was noted that cellulase, xylanase and alpha-amylase show similar results: the percentage of the large fraction varies from 8.7–9.5, pectinase shows a significantly lower indicator — 4.4, which indicates a deeper transformation of organic matter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it