MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413954885 · doi:10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100363

Pulse pressure as a predictor of Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers and cognitive decline: The moderating role of APOE ε4

2025· article· en· W4413954885 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joon Hyung Jung, Nayeong Kong, Seung‐Hoon Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKorea National Institute of HealthNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsApolipoprotein ECognitive declineDiseaseInternal medicinePulse pressurePsychologyCognitionAlzheimer's diseaseMedicineDementiaNeuroscienceBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Elevated pulse pressure (PP), indicative of arterial stiffness, has been implicated in cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. However, its role in preclinical AD and interactions with genetic risk factors like apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE4) remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between baseline PP and AD biomarkers (amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau) and cognitive decline, and to determine whether APOE4 carrier status moderates these relationships. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study and secondary analysis of the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's (A4) randomized clinical trial SETTING: Multicenter observational cohort and randomized clinical trial conducted at 67 sites across the United States, Canada, Australia, and Japan. PARTICIPANTS: This study included 1690 cognitively unimpaired older adults from the A4 and Longitudinal Evaluation of Amyloid Risk and Neurodegeneration (LEARN) studies. Participants underwent baseline PP assessment, Aβ and tau PET imaging, and cognitive testing with longitudinal follow-up over 240 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Blood pressure was measured at baseline, with PP calculated as the difference between systolic and diastolic pressures. AD pathologies were assessed through Aβ PET imaging using 18F-Florbetapir, and regional tau deposition in inferior temporal and meta-temporal regions using 18F-Flortaucipir PET imaging. Cognitive performance was measured using the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC). RESULTS: Higher baseline PP was significantly associated with increased Aβ (β = 0.078; p = 0.001), inferior temporal tau (β = 0.110; p = 0.032), and meta-temporal tau deposition (β = 0.116; p = 0.022). In longitudinal analyses, elevated PP predicted greater decline in PACC scores (β = -0.020; p < 0.001). APOE4 status moderated these associations, with significant effects of PP on tau deposition and cognitive decline observed exclusively among APOE4 carriers. Mediation analysis indicated that tau deposition significantly mediated the association between PP and cognitive decline (indirect effect β = -0.068; 95 % CI [-0.126, -0.011]). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated PP is associated with increased AD biomarker burden and accelerated cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired older adults, particularly among APOE4 carriers. Our study suggests that arterial stiffness may contribute to AD pathogenesis and progression via tau pathology. These results highlight the potential of vascular health management as an early intervention target for AD prevention, especially in genetically at-risk populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s DiseaseSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207