Nuclear Protein Aggregates Disrupt RNA Processing and Alter Biomechanics in a Muscle Cell Model of OPMD
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aggregation of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) is a hallmark of several age-related neuromuscular diseases. However, our understanding of how these aggregates drive dysfunction is often limited by the use of non-disease-relevant models. Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) is caused by a short alanine expansion mutation in the PABPN1 gene, which leads to nuclear aggregation of the protein. To investigate how these aggregates impair muscle cell function, we developed a muscle cell model with inducible expression of the pathogenic PABPN1 (A16) variant and confirmed its relevance to OPMD. Using subcellular fractionation combined with mass spectrometry and RNA sequencing, we examined the molecular consequences of nuclear PABPN1 aggregation. In the cytoplasmic fraction, we observed significant impairments in cellular metabolism and biomechanics. In the nuclear fraction, RNA metabolism was broadly disrupted, and additional RBPs were significantly enriched in insoluble aggregates. Importantly, mRNAs trapped within the aggregates were associated with impaired nuclear export and decreased translation efficiency, and the pathogenic PABPN1 variant led to reduced endogenous PABPN1 levels. Our findings support a model in which OPMD pathology arises from reduced levels of soluble PABPN1 due to nuclear aggregation and establish a mechanistic link between RBP aggregation and muscle cell dysfunction, highlighting shared pathological pathways across neuromuscular and neurodegenerative diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it