MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413966121 · doi:10.70930/tac/et85mnq7

Coequalizers and free triples, II

2019· article· en· W4413966121 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael Barr, John F. Kennison, R. Raphael

Bibliographic record

VenueTheory and applications of categories · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Logic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies a category X with an endofunctor T : X / / X .A T -algebra is given by a morphism T X / / X in X .We examine the related questions of when T freely generates a triple (or monad) on X ; when an object X X freely generates a T -algebra; and when the category of T -algebras has coequalizers and other colimits.The paper defines a category of "T -horns" which effectively contains X as well as all T -algebras.It is assumed that X is cocomplete and has a factorization system (E , M ) satisfying reasonable properties.An ordinal-indexed sequence of T -horns is then defined which provides successive approximations to a free T -algebra generated by an object X X , as well as approximations to coequalizers and other colimits for the category of T -algebras.Using the notions of an M -cone and a separated T -horn it is shown that if X is M -well-powered, then the ordinal sequence stabilizes at the desired free algebra or coequalizer or other colimit whenever they exist.This paper is a successor to a paper written by the first author in 1970 that showed that T generates a free triple when every X X generates a free T -algebra.We also consider colimits in triple algebras and give some examples of functors T for which no X X generates a free T -algebra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheory and applications of categoriesSame topicAdvanced Algebra and LogicFrench-language works237,207