Usefulness of Muscle Stiffness Evaluated by Ultrasonography for Detecting Muscle Change Related to Contracture in Frail Older Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Ultrasonography can be used to evaluate the echo intensity (EI) and strain ratio (SR) to identify muscle quality and stiffness, respectively. EI and SR are affected by aging, frailty, and joint angle positions. We investigated the effects of aging and frailty on muscle EI and SR at different joint angle positions, and identified a useful measurement method to reflect muscle changes related to contractures in frail older adults. Methods: This study had a cross-sectional design. Twenty-two healthy young adults (young group), 22 non-frail older adults (non-frail group), and 22 frail older adults (frail group) participated in this study. The range of motion (ROM) of hip abduction, EI, and SR of the adductor longus in the zero- and full-abduction positions were measured. To investigate the effects of aging and frailty, the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the post-hoc Steel-Dwass test, was used. In addition, to confirm whether EI and SR in each position were useful for assessing contracture, Spearman's correlation test was used. Results: < .001) showed strong and moderate correlation with the ROM, respectively. Conclusions: SR in full-abduction is affected by both frailty and aging and is useful for evaluating muscle stiffness related to contracture in frail older adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".