Inter-limb asymmetries in professional male basketball and volleyball players: bilateral vs. unilateral jump comparison
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to examine differences in inter-limb asymmetries between countermovement vertical jump (CMJ) and single-leg jump (SLJ) performed on an innovative portable force plate system. Seventy professional athletes competing in top-tier international leagues (e.g. NBA, Super League) participated in this investigation. Following the completion of a standardized warm-up, athletes stepped on a uni-axial dual-force plate system and performed three CMJs and six SLJs without an arm swing in randomized order. Peak takeoff and landing forces were recorded for each limb, from which asymmetry percentages were derived. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to make statistical comparisons (p < 0.05). Significant differences were found in all asymmetry-related metrics, overall (CMJ vs. SLJ; takeoff: 7.2 vs. 1.0%; landing: 3.3 vs. 6.8%) and within each sport. Peak takeoff force asymmetry was considerably greater in CMJ than in SLJ, while peak landing force asymmetry displayed a reverse trend, with notably greater inter-limb asymmetries being detected within SLJ than CMJ. While both tests can offer useful information to sports practitioners, these results suggest that CMJ and SLJ should not be used interchangeably but rather in conjunction with one another to obtain a better insight into athletes’ performance capabilities and inter-limb asymmetry magnitudes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".