MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Variation in the molecular phenotype of βglu1, an insect defense-related beta-glucosidase gene, in two transcontinental Picea species

2025· article· en· W4413968142 on OpenAlexaff
Ernest Wu, Tin Hang Hung, Nadir Erbilgin, Aziz Ullah, Āris Jansons, Hisham A. A. Ali, Sonya M. Clegg, John Mackay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsectPhenotypeGeneBiologyVariation (astronomy)BETA (programming language)BotanyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forest trees face threats from many insect pest species, underscoring the importance of understanding their defense mechanisms for survival. In a North American conifer species Picea glauca, white spruce, a defense-related gene, βglu1, is responsible for releasing phenolic compounds (acetophenones) to defend against its insect defoliator, Choristoneura fumiferana, the eastern spruce budworm. βglu1 is also expressed in a Eurasian conifer species Picea abies, Norway spruce, although no major insect defoliator is present within the species’ natural range. We compared range-wide variation of βglu1 transcript levels from foliage samples of P. glauca in North America and P. abies in Europe using RT-qPCR and targeted transcriptome sequencing. βglu1 transcript levels were highly correlated between the two methods, with wide ranges of variation being detected within and between populations in both species. We found a significant longitudinal gradient in βglu1 transcript levels in P. glauca, with one βglu1 gene form being differentially expressed across populations, but not in P. abies. The expression level differences in P. glauca are consistent with the historically higher C. fumiferana outbreak frequency and severity in eastern compared to western populations, with C. fumiferana defoliation severity being a significant explanatory variable for βglu1 transcript levels. Climate per se was not a significant explanatory factor in either species. Overall, these results enhance our understanding of potential adaptive variation in acetophenone defenses in P. glauca, while the factors influencing βglu1 transcript variation in P. abies require further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207