MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413969390 · doi:10.1002/mdc3.70338

Progressive Supranuclear Palsy—A Global Review

2025· review· en· W4413969390 on OpenAlexaff
Prashanth Lingappa Kukkle, Rosy Neupane, Alexander Pantelyat, Anne‐Marie Wills, Edwin Jabbari, Elise G.P. Dopper, Gábor G. Kovács, Günter U. Höglinger, Ikuko Aiba, Irene Litvan, Jacky Ganguly, Kigocha Okeng’o, Ryuji Sakakibara, Shelley L. Forrest, Stefan Lorenzl, Yared Z. Zewde, Yaroslau Compta, Huw R. Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders Clinical Practice · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research CentreCentre for Movement DisordersUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProgressive supranuclear palsyNeurosciencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicinePsychologyPathologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) is a rare and severe neurodegenerative tauopathy characterized by diverse clinical phenotypes, including Richardson's syndrome (PSP-RS), PSP-parkinsonism (PSP-P), PSP-progressive gait freezing (PSP-PGF), and PSP-corticobasal syndrome (PSP-CBS). Significant geographic variation exists in prevalence, clinical presentations, and prognosis. OBJECTIVES: This global review aims to systematically evaluate the epidemiological variation, clinical phenotypes, diagnostic practices, and management strategies for PSP, focusing on regional disparities and identifying influencing genetic and environmental factors. METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted, analyzing studies reporting PSP epidemiology, phenotypes, diagnostic criteria, risk factors, treatments, and prognoses. Data were categorized into epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentations, diagnosis, treatment accessibility, and outcomes, considering geographic variation. RESULTS: Global PSP prevalence ranges between 5-6.4 per 100,000, influenced by diagnostic criteria and healthcare infrastructure. Clinical manifestations commonly include supranuclear gaze palsy, frequent falls, cognitive impairment, and motor dysfunction. Prognosis significantly varies with subtype; PSP-RS shows rapid progression and shorter survival (5-7 years), whereas PSP-P has a milder clinical course (8-12 years). Regional variations highlight differences in genetic predispositions, notably the MAPT H1 haplotype, environmental risk factors such as dietary neurotoxins and industrial pollutants, and accessibility to comprehensive healthcare services. Diagnostic accuracy has improved with the adoption of MDS-PSP criteria, facilitating recognition of diverse phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Regional disparities in PSP prevalence, phenotypic presentation, and healthcare accessibility underscore the importance of standardized diagnostic criteria, targeted genetic and environmental studies, and equitable healthcare strategies. Enhanced global collaboration is essential for improving PSP diagnosis, management, and patient outcomes worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.478
Teacher spread0.415 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement Disorders Clinical PracticeSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207