Mental Health Impact of Massage and Massage Therapy for Survivors of Domestic and Family Violence and/or Sexual Abuse: A Scoping Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Sexual abuse (SA) and domestic and family violence (DFV) are a worldwide issue with high incidence rates. While massage therapists are not generally frontline responders, they may see individuals presenting with the lifelong sequelae of DFV/SA. Purpose: The aim of this scoping review is to characterize the nature, scope, quality, and potential reach of publications within the massage therapy and research fields that focus on massage and massage therapy treatment for those who have or are currently experiencing DFV and/or SA. Additional objectives for this review are the intent to compile a summary of practice- and evidence-based recommendations and completion of an appraisal of included publications. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's six-step scoping review framework and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The electronic databases PubMed, ProQuest, CENTRAL, CINHAL, Web of Science, and MEDLINE as well as Google Scholar were searched to identify publications. Summaries of the publications were undertaken as the included publications did not yield enough rich qualitative data to undertake a thematic analysis. Results: Twenty-six publications were included from five countries with the most papers coming from the United States. The review demonstrated multiple psychological benefits of massage with the majority of publications presenting mental health improvements as the predominant impact of massage therapy on individuals who had experienced DFV/SA; however, the majority of the interventional benefits came from SA research. Conclusion: The review highlighted a void in the interventional research on massage and DFV with no interventional study focusing on DFV and massage solely despite anecdotal evidence of benefit. There was also a lack of evidence of impact of massage in clinical practice for individuals with any history of DFV/SA. There is potential that massage therapy may be a useful tool in aiding survivors' recovery, if administered by trained individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.061 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".