Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Neuropathies Treated with Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) are immune-mediated peripheral nerve disorders. Treatment typically involves immunoglobulin therapy, with both intravenous (IVIG) and subcutaneous (SCIG) routes being used. Although multiple studies have determined that these therapies are effective and comparable, a comprehensive assessment of quality of life (QoL) has not been systematically reviewed. This review aims to evaluate QoL in patients with MMN and CIDP who are treated with SCIG, including those who have made the transition from IVIG to SCIG. We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases for studies that measured QoL outcomes in MMN and CIDP patients receiving SCIG. The primary outcome was the change in QoL scores as measured by validated tools compared with baseline values collected during IVIG treatment. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects, treatment satisfaction and functional status. Our review suggests that SCIG may offer comparable QoL outcomes to IVIG with potential benefits in self-administration and reduced systemic adverse effects. This review provides evidence-based insights into the comparative effectiveness of SCIG and IVIG in improving QoL for MMN and CIDP patients. Future research should aim to standardize QoL assessment tools and include larger, long-term studies to better capture the nuanced benefits of SCIG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".