MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characteristics of cost-related avoidance of oral health services among people in Canada eligible for the Canadian Dental Care Plan.

2025· article· en· W4413972041 on OpenAlexaffabout
Juliana V Gondro, Monica Emode, Dana Ivancevic, Janine Clarke, Kayla Ortlieb, Julie Farmer

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Health and Care Utilization
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOral healthDental carePlan (archaeology)MedicineFamily medicineEnvironmental healthGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cost and lack of dental insurance coverage are major obstacles to accessing dental care in Canada. This study estimates the prevalence and explores the characteristics of cost-related avoidance of oral health services among a nationally representative sample of people in Canada aged 12 years and older who may qualify for coverage under the Canadian Dental Care Plan (CDCP). Data and methods: Data from the 2023 to 2024 Canadian Oral Health Survey were used to construct a population-based cohort of CDCP-eligible individuals based on income and insurance status. The responses from 11,189 CDCP-eligible individuals in Canada who answered questions about avoiding visits to an oral health professional or avoiding recommended dental care because of the cost were analyzed. Generalized linear models were used to examine the association between sociodemographic characteristics and the outcomes of cost-related avoidance of oral health services. Results: During the period from November 2023 to March 2024 - before the CDCP was available to help pay for care - 47% of CDCP-eligible individuals avoided visits to an oral health professional and 38% avoided recommended dental care in the past year because of the cost. Young and middle-aged adults, uninsured individuals (compared with those with public insurance), and individuals with an adjusted family net income of less than $38,800 reported greater cost-related avoidance of oral health services. After adjustments, dental insurance status (odds ratio [OR]: 5.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.74 to 8.94) and self-reported mouth problems (OR: 4.80; 95% CI: 3.87 to 5.96) had the strongest association with cost-related avoidance of dental visits in the past year. The same was true for cost-related avoidance of recommended dental care (OR: 3.15; 95% CI: 2.07 to 4.78 and OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 4.17 to 6.27, respectively). Interpretation: This study identified cost as a significant barrier to accessing oral health care for nearly half of CDCP-eligible individuals. The findings suggest that the use of oral health services by CDCP-eligible individuals in Canada is largely influenced by their income and ability to pay out of pocket for dental care expenses, rather than their need for treatment, leaving many vulnerable to unmet oral health care needs. Establishing baseline estimates of cost-related avoidance before the CDCP became available to help pay for care is essential for gauging the success of easing financial barriers and facilitating effective program monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicDental Health and Care UtilizationFrench-language works237,207