MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413987664 · doi:10.30845/ijhss.v15p34

Impact of Covid-19 on the Economic Situation of Women in the Non-Formal Sector in Southern Benin

2025· article· en· W4413987664 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
AFFO Mingnimon Alphonse, DANSOU Justin, ACOTCHEOU Pacôme Evènakpon, NANI Horacio, IGAN Eudoxe

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Humanities and Social Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Economic growthGeographyPolitical scienceSocioeconomicsVirologySociologyEconomicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Covid-19 pandemic has posed one of the most significant challenges globally over the past five years, straining public policies and hindering access to essential services, particularly for women. This article aims to evaluate the pandemic’s impact on the economic situation of women in the informal sector in southern Benin. Data were sourced from a household survey conducted among households with members aged 15-64 as part of the "Rise Bénin" project, funded by the Women Rise program (Canada). The Seemingly Unrelated Bivariate Probit Regression (SURE probit) model was employed to simultaneously analyze the impact of Covid-19 on income and employment loss. The findings reveal that response measures, such as the cordon sanitaire (COSAN) and the closure of entertainment venues, significantly increased the probability of income and employment loss among women. Sustainable post-Covid-19 recovery strategies must incorporate public policies with support measures specifically tailored to the needs of women in the sectors most affected by the pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Humanities and Social ScienceSame topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207