MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413987898 · doi:10.1115/1.4069689

An Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content-Enabled Personalized Design Approach for Proactive User Interaction in an Immersive Environment

2025· article· en· W4413987898 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mechanical Design · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPersona Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyScience, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen MunicipalityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHuman–computer interactionComputer scienceContent (measure theory)Multimedia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rapid advancement of artificial intelligence and immersive technologies is revolutionizing various sectors, notably product design. However, the traditional personalized design process, which depends on predefined elements with limited user input, often results in products that do not fully align with individual preferences and lack substantial user engagement. To fill this gap, the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated content (AIGC) presents a significant opportunity for mass personalization through natural language interactions. Inspired by this paradigm, this article proposes an AIGC-enabled personalized product design approach, which integrates a configuration retrieval model with a fine-tuned text-to-3D generative model (TAPS3D model), enabling users to create personalized products within an immersive environment. While the current system requires approximately two minutes for 3D shape generation, this level of responsiveness is considered suitable for concept exploration in early-stage design workflows, where rapid iteration is prioritized over instantaneous feedback. Furthermore, a case study is conducted focusing on the design of personalized steering wheels to demonstrate the feasibility of this methodology. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the proposed approach in improving user experience is evaluated using a comparative experiment with the traditional configuration system. The findings indicate that our proposed AIGC-enabled personalized design system effectively enhances personalization, facilitates user engagement, improves the interaction experience, and increases user satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it