A Quantum-Inspired Hybrid Artificial Neural Network for Identifying the Dynamic Parameters of Mobile Car-Like Robots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate prediction of a robot’s dynamic parameters, including mass and moment of inertia, is essential for adequate motion planning and control in autonomous systems. Traditional methods often depend on manual computation or physics-based modelling, which can be time-consuming and approximate for intricate, real-world environments. Recent advances in machine learning, primarily through artificial neural networks (ANNs), offer profitable alternatives. However, the potential of quantum-inspired models in this context remains largely uncharted. The current research assesses the predictive performance of a classical artificial neural network (CANN) and a quantum-inspired artificial neural network (QANN) in estimating a car-like mobile robot’s mass and moment of inertia. The predictive accurateness of the models was considered by minimizing a cost function, which was characterized as the RMSE between the predicted and actual values. The outcomes indicate that while both models demonstrated commendable performance, QANN consistently surpassed CANN. On average, QANN achieved a 9.7% reduction in training RMSE, decreasing from 0.0031 to 0.0028, and an 84.4% reduction in validation RMSE, dropping from 0.125 to 0.0195 compared to CANN. These enhancements highlight QANN’s singular predictive accuracy and greater capacity for generalization to unseen data. In contrast, CANN displayed overfitting tendencies, especially during the training phase. These findings emphasize the significance of quantum-inspired neural networks in enhancing prediction precision for involved regression tasks. The QANN framework has the potential for wider applications in robotics, including autonomous vehicles, uncrewed aerial vehicles, and intelligent automation systems, where accurate dynamic modelling is necessary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".