MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of Blood Pressure Self-Management on Vascular Remodeling After Hypertensive Pregnancy

2025· article· en· W4413993094 on OpenAlexaff
Jamie Kitt, Luca Biasiolli, Samuel Krasner, Paul Bateman, Hannah Rebecca Cutler, Logan C. Barr, Annabelle Frost, Katherine L. Tucker, Katie Suriano, Yvonne Kenworthy, Winok Lapidaire, Miriam Lacharie, Rebecca Mills, Cristian Román, Lucy Mackillop, Christina Aye, Alexandra Cairns, B. Thilaganathan, Lucy C. Chappell, Adam J. Lewandowski, Richard J. McManus, Paul Leeson

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlood pressurePulse wave velocityPregnancyPreeclampsiaCardiologyInternal medicineGestational hypertensionArterial stiffnessPostpartum periodPulse pressureObstetrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive pregnancy disorders are associated with long-term adverse cardiac and vascular remodeling post index pregnancy. The POP-HT trial (Physician Optimised Postpartum Hypertension Treatment) demonstrated that improved puerperal blood pressure control leads to reduced blood pressure and beneficial cardiac remodeling during the first year postpartum. This study describes the impact on postpartum vascular remodeling. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point trial in a single UK hospital where 220 women were assigned 1:1 to intervention (self-management via physician-guided antihypertensive titration) or control (usual postnatal care via primary care doctor±midwife). Eligible participants were ≥18 years, with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension and requiring antihypertensives on discharge. Prespecified secondary vascular outcomes included aortic blood pressure and pulse wave velocity measured by Vicorder at baseline and 9 months postpartum, and additional cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of aortic distensibility were performed. RESULTS: There were no baseline differences in aortic blood pressure or pulse wave velocity but by 9 months postpartum, aortic diastolic blood pressure was −5.2 mm Hg lower ([95% CI, −8.0 to −2.2]; P <0.001), and pulse wave velocity was −0.71 m/s lower ([95% CI, −1.42 to −0.06]; P =0.048) in the intervention arm compared with the control arm, which corresponded with greater aortic distensibility by 0.78×10 − 3 mm Hg − 1 ([95% CI, 0.01 to 1.55]; P =0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum blood pressure self-monitoring combined with physician-guided medication titration is associated with reduced central arterial stiffness during the first year after a hypertensive pregnancy, in addition to the previously demonstrated effects on blood pressure and cardiac remodeling. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04273854.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypertensionSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207