MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413998777 · doi:10.3389/frhs.2025.1609418

Assessing the determinants of uptake and hesitancy in accessing COVID 19 vaccines in Nigeria: a scoping review

2025· review· en· W4413998777 on OpenAlexaff
Chikezie Ifeanyi, Emmanuel Chijioke Okechukwu, Olushola Tosin, Ichoku Hyacinth, John E. Ataguba, Grace Njeri Muriithi, Daniel Malik Achala, Elizabeth Naa Adukwei Adote, Chinyere Mbachu, Senait Alemayehu Beshah, Chijioke O. Nwosu, John Thato Tlhakanelo, James Akazili, Nyasha Masuka

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Health Services · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakVirologyPsychologyMedicineOutbreakInternal medicineDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is one of the largest public health threats in recent times, with significant health, economic, and social consequences globally. The WHO reported that over 651 million cases and 6.6 million deaths were attributed to COVID-19 globally. The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) in 2022 revealed that 266,057 cases with 3,155 deaths were reported. All the thirty-six states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) of Nigeria were affected, but Lagos and the FCT reported the highest number of cases. However, it is possible that these numbers do not accurately reflect the severity of COVID-19 disease in Nigeria because the country had only tested 5,160,280 people as at 2022, despite a population of around 200 million. Nigeria did not meet its 2021 vaccination target, prompting the need to identify the contextual factors affecting vaccine access and uptake as well as vaccine hesitancy in Nigeria and document the approaches that can be deployed to reduce opposition to vaccination as well as improve advocacy for vaccine equity. This scoping review, conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's framework, aimed to explore the factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake in Nigeria. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across electronic databases, including Google Scholar and PubMed, with studies from Nigeria published in English. The review included 25 studies on vaccine hesitancy, uptake, and willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccination, identifying barriers at the national, community, and individual levels. The results indicated that 90% of the studies showed low vaccine acceptance and uptake, with barriers related to vaccine availability, misinformation, cultural and religious influences, socioeconomic factors, and lack of trust in the health system. Socio-demographic factors such as gender, age, education, and income were identified as key influences. The findings highlight the need for targeted, evidence-based strategies to address vaccine hesitancy, improve vaccine distribution, and engage diverse population groups to enhance vaccination uptake across Nigeria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.391 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Health ServicesSame topicVaccine Coverage and HesitancyFrench-language works237,207