MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414000697 · doi:10.18280/jesa.580701

Toward Smart Factories: Modelling Hybrid RF and VLC Communication Channels for IIoT Applications

2025· article· en· W4414000697 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ameur Chaabna, Takoua Hafsi, Abdesselam Babouri, Zine Eddine Meguetta, Mohamed Benrabah, Halim Chouabia, Xun Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisible light communicationTelecommunicationsComputer scienceRadio frequencyEngineeringElectrical engineeringLight-emitting diode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LED lighting technology has gained wide popularity in recent years.Visible Light Communication (VLC) stands to become an excellent replacement medium for indoor high-speed Internet and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).This work aims to model a hybrid wireless communication system, where a visible light channel and a radio frequency (RF) channel work together to form a Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) system.Combining optical and RF communication channels can boost data rate as optical devices have higher bandwidths.The analysis is conducted by examining the application of collaborative robots (Cobots).VLC links will direct downwards from ceilings (downlink) to deliver data as well as illumination.However, shining lamps upwards (uplink) will produce an uncomfortable glare.RF can not only provide the uplink, but it can also improve stability and speed if it operates together with VLC.Many principles, like frequency reuse plan and Shannon spectral efficiency, have been applied to enhance and improve our results.This study investigates the Bit Error Ratio (BER) in OOK modulation, multi-user access, received power distribution, and hybrid VLC/Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi) networks.Clear advantages can be seen, particularly in critical areas where traditional RF communications may pose security risks or suffer from interference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207