Re-making selves and social worlds: Experiences of live-in substance use treatment among adolescents experiencing social structural marginalization in Vancouver
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Across many settings in Canada and the US, overdose is now a leading cause of death among 10 to 18-year-olds. In the Canadian province of British Columbia (BC), there have been increased efforts to connect adolescents with substance use treatment, including live-in programs. While much previous work has focused on barriers to treatment among youth, less research has examined how adolescents, and in particular those experiencing high levels of residential instability, homelessness, and institutionalization via child protection, criminal legal and housing systems, understand and experience these programs. This qualitative study draws on semi-structured interviews with 37 adolescents and those who were very recently adolescents aged 14 to 20 who planned to access, were accessing or had recently accessed "Cypress Place" (a pseudonym), a live-in treatment program for adolescents in Vancouver, BC. Drawing on concepts of self and social world-making, our findings reveal that the changes adolescents envisioned making through live-in treatment extended far beyond abstinence from substance use, to encompass significant shifts in who they were and who they surrounded themselves with. While the weight of the social structural contexts that "followed" youth into treatment could powerfully undermine their abilities to make desired changes, this study nevertheless provides insights into how transformative projects of self and social world-making can be better supported across their treatment trajectories. Namely, providers and programs can work to bridge the kinds of self and social transformations achieved during live-in treatment with what comes next by providing opportunities for youth to stay connected and prioritizing the development of skills for living well - as individuals and as part of collectivities - that open up possibilities for recovery and healing over the longer term.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".