MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414006145 · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100631

Re-making selves and social worlds: Experiences of live-in substance use treatment among adolescents experiencing social structural marginalization in Vancouver

2025· article· en· W4414006145 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Monique Sandhu, Madison Thulien, Cameron R. Eekhoudt, Drew Friesen, Eva Moore, Martha J. Ignaszewski, Sarah M. Bagley, Rossio Motta‐Ochoa, Emily Jenkins, Danya Fast

Bibliographic record

VenueSSM - Qualitative Research in Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMental Health and Patient Involvement
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BCOntario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental HealthCanadian Mental Health AssociationInnovation Cluster (Canada)Université de MontréalBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institutes of HealthSick Kids FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenVancouver Foundation
KeywordsSubstance useSocial worldsPsychologySocial psychologySociologyDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Across many settings in Canada and the US, overdose is now a leading cause of death among 10 to 18-year-olds. In the Canadian province of British Columbia (BC), there have been increased efforts to connect adolescents with substance use treatment, including live-in programs. While much previous work has focused on barriers to treatment among youth, less research has examined how adolescents, and in particular those experiencing high levels of residential instability, homelessness, and institutionalization via child protection, criminal legal and housing systems, understand and experience these programs. This qualitative study draws on semi-structured interviews with 37 adolescents and those who were very recently adolescents aged 14 to 20 who planned to access, were accessing or had recently accessed "Cypress Place" (a pseudonym), a live-in treatment program for adolescents in Vancouver, BC. Drawing on concepts of self and social world-making, our findings reveal that the changes adolescents envisioned making through live-in treatment extended far beyond abstinence from substance use, to encompass significant shifts in who they were and who they surrounded themselves with. While the weight of the social structural contexts that "followed" youth into treatment could powerfully undermine their abilities to make desired changes, this study nevertheless provides insights into how transformative projects of self and social world-making can be better supported across their treatment trajectories. Namely, providers and programs can work to bridge the kinds of self and social transformations achieved during live-in treatment with what comes next by providing opportunities for youth to stay connected and prioritizing the development of skills for living well - as individuals and as part of collectivities - that open up possibilities for recovery and healing over the longer term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0210.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.519
GPT teacher head0.627
Teacher spread0.108 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSM - Qualitative Research in HealthSame topicMental Health and Patient InvolvementFrench-language works237,207