No effect of ocean acidification on individual-level variation in behaviour and susceptibility to predation in a Great Barrier Reef damselfish
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1) Ocean acidification, caused by rising carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, has been reported to negatively impact a wide variety of behaviours in fishes, including activity, exploration, and predator avoidance. 2) These effects have been documented at the population level, but many animal species naturally show large and repeatable individual-level differences in behaviour. How environmental stressors, such as ocean acidification, affect behavioural variation at the individual level remains largely unknown but is critically important to understand adaptation given natural selection operates on variation at the individual rather than population level. 3) Using a statistical approach allowing variation in means and variation in variance to be modeled within a single framework, we quantified individual-level differences across five behaviours in the coral reef damselfish Pomacentrus amboinensis (emergence time, activity level, time spent sheltering, thigmotaxis, novel object inspection). We measured behaviour in a novel environment assay, twice before (CO2 ~450 µatm) and twice following acclimation to predicted end-of-century ocean acidification conditions (~1,100 µatm). 4) Following behavioural assays, we tested individual survival in a live predation experiment. We used predatory rock cod, Cephalopholis microprion, acclimated to the same CO2 treatments as Ambon damsel and examined predictors of survival probability. 5) All behaviours in damselfish were moderately and significantly repeatable, with no marked differences in repeatability estimates between the ambient CO2 and elevated CO2 treatment groups. Exposure to end-of-century ocean acidification conditions had no effect on any of the five behaviours measured, both in terms of group means and residual (within-individual) variance. 6) The probability of survival in the predation trials was similar for damselfish in the elevated and ambient CO2 treatment groups. Smaller damselfish as well as those that spent a greater amount of time inspecting a novel object (i.e., bolder individuals) had a lower probability of survival regardless of their CO2 treatment. 7) Our results challenge assumptions about the impacts of ocean acidification on coral reef fish behaviour and susceptibility to predation, both at the population and individual level. They also provide support for a trade-off between boldness and predation risk in fish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".