MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414011062 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.113511

Disruption of the transsulfuration pathway by acute kidney injury causes intestinal damage

2025· article· en· W4414011062 on OpenAlexafffund
Shunshun Jin, Charith U. B. Wijerathne, Yaw L. Siow, O Karmin

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Kidney Injury Research
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFondation de l’Hôpital Saint-Boniface
KeywordsTranssulfurationAcute kidney injuryKidneyChemistryMedicineBiochemistryInternal medicineCysteineEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute kidney injury (AKI) impairs intestinal function through oxidative stress. The transsulfuration pathway is essential for sulfur amino acid metabolism and antioxidant defense through glutathione biosynthesis. This study investigated how AKI caused intestinal injury and the mechanisms involved. AKI was induced in Sprague-Dawley rats through kidney ischemia (45 min)-reperfusion (24 h). AKI decreased intestinal glutathione (antioxidant) levels and compromised intestinal barrier function. Glutathione biosynthesis in mammals requires cysteine made through the reverse transsulfuration pathway, catalyzed by cystathionine beta-synthase (CBS) and cystathionine gamma-lyase (CSE). AKI decreased the expression of these enzymes in intestinal epithelium. AKI also altered gut microbiota composition and the expression of bacterial enzymes in the forward transsulfuration pathway, which could disrupt intestinal antioxidant defense. The inhibition of this pathway in gut epithelial cells reduced glutathione levels and tight junction protein expression. These results suggest that the disruption of the transsulfuration pathway impairs antioxidant defense, leading to intestinal barrier damage and dysbiosis in AKI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicAcute Kidney Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207