Autonomic Plexuses of the Female Sexual Organs Travel Within Pubocervical and Rectovaginal [Endopelvic] Fascia: A Rationale for ‘Nerve‐Aware’ Vaginal Prolapse Repair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The connective tissue support of female pelvic viscera-endopelvic fascia-has been studied in fetal and immunohistochemical models to demonstrate its relationship with the autonomic nerves of the female pelvis. Due to a paucity of literature examining the gross anatomical relationships between endopelvic fascia and autonomic nerves in adult female pelvises, it remains unknown whether defects in endopelvic fascia predisposing pelvic organ prolapse and/or manipulation of endopelvic fascia during prolapse repair may be the cause of prolapse-related pelvic pain and sexual dysfunction. Through the dissection of formalin-fixed hemipelvises (n = 10) the present study aimed to map the loci of the visceral branches of the inferior hypogastric plexus and associate them with endopelvic fascia of the female pelvis. In all specimens, two gross bundles of autonomic nerves were identified within pubocervical fascia traveling caudally to innervate the clitoral crura, vestibular bulbs, and anterior vaginal wall. Moreover, a distinct bundle was found traveling within the rectovaginal septum innervating the posterior vaginal wall. Immunohistochemical staining for S100 protein confirmed the presence of nerves and ganglia within pubocervical fascia that were localized near the vaginal arteries. Additionally, our dissections revealed that the visceral branches of the inferior hypogastric plexus can be stratified to correspond to different named components of endopelvic fascia. Clinically, our results provide a robust anatomical characterization that will inform the development of surgical approaches to reduce the risk of pelvic neuropathy during vaginal prolapse surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".