MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414020224 · doi:10.3390/jcdd12090342

Comparative Study on Cardiac Findings in Patients with Transthyretin Amyloidosis Before and After Treatment with a Transthyretin Silencer

2025· article· en· W4414020224 on OpenAlexaff
Priya Arivalagan, Diego Delgado

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransthyretinSilencerAmyloidosisCardiac amyloidosisMedicineInternal medicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is a rare disease caused by misfolded proteins, amyloids, that are deposited in various organs and tissues, typically the heart and/or nerves, causing the development of cardiomyopathy (CM) and polyneuropathy (PN). Although this may be an incurable disease, there are various treatments that are currently available for patients with ATTR, including transthyretin (TTR) silencers such as inotersen and patisiran. The silencers help slow down the progression of disease and improve the quality of life of patients with ATTR by alleviating the cardiac and neurological symptoms that patients present. The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiac findings observed in the 99Tc-PYP scintigraphy (PYP scan) parameters of patients with a mixed phenotype before and after treatment with inotersen or patisiran. This study included ten patients from the amyloidosis clinic at the University Health Network. All of the patients (average age: 63.80 ± 11.70; 60.0% males, 40.0% females) received inotersen or patisiran as their treatment. These patients underwent a PYP scan before and after treatment to observe any improvements in terms of their CM post-treatment. Nine (90.0%) patients showed an improvement with their CM, as they showed a decrease in their heart-to-contralateral lung (H/CL) ratio and/or pyrophosphate (PYP) grade based on their results from the PYP scan post-treatment with a TTR silencer. Only one patient (10.0%) had worsening results, as their H/CL ratio and PYP grade increased post-treatment in comparison to the PYP scan results pre-treatment. Patients with ATTR who have a mixed phenotype should undergo a PYP scan before and after treatment with a TTR silencer. By undergoing these scans, the effectiveness of this treatment could be determined by observing any improvements in the signs of CM. A decrease in the H/CL ratio and/or the PYP grade would indicate that the TTR silencer has been effective in alleviating the signs and symptoms of CM, and that the patients should continue with their treatment plan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular Development and DiseaseSame topicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesFrench-language works237,207