Discovery of additional ancient genome duplications in yeasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Whole genome duplication (WGD) has had profound macroevolutionary impacts on diverse lineages, preceding adaptive radiations in vertebrates, teleost fish, and angiosperms. In contrast to the many known ancient WGDs in animals and especially plants, we are aware of evidence for only four in fungi. The oldest of these occurred ~100 million years ago (mya) and is shared by ~60 extant Saccharomycetales species, including the baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Notably, this is the only known ancient WGD in the yeast subphylum Saccharomycotina. The dearth of ancient WGD events in fungi remains a mystery. Some studies have suggested that fungal lineages that experience chromosome and genome duplication quickly go extinct, leaving no trace in the genomic record, while others contend that the lack of known WGD is due to an absence of data. Under the second hypothesis, additional sampling and deeper sequencing of fungal genomes should lead to the discovery of more WGD events. Coupling hundreds of recently published genomes from nearly every described Saccharomycotina species with three additional long-read assemblies, we discovered three novel WGD events. While the functions of retained duplicate genes originating from these events are broad, they bear many similarities to the well-known WGD that occurred in the Saccharomycetales. Our results suggest that WGD may be a more common evolutionary force in fungi than previously believed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".