MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414028458 · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1541583

Telephone-based group mental health support for older adults in central Canada: pilot acceptability and effectiveness findings of The CONNECT Program

2025· article· en· W4414028458 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kristin Reynolds, Kira Kudar, Jarod Joshi, Inga Christianson, Dylan Davidson, Georgia Gopinath, Lesley Koven, Corey S. Mackenzie, Stacey Miller, Nancy E. Newall

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityManitoba Beekeepers' AssociationUniversity of Manitoba
FundersResearch Manitoba
KeywordsMental healthGerontologyMedicinePsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Though experiences of anxiety, depression, loneliness, and social isolation are prevalent among older adults, treatment access is limited. In central Canada, based on participatory program development methods, our team of researchers, clinical psychologists, and community experts have developed and piloted a novel 6-session telephone-based group intervention called The CONNECT Program, based on the principles of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), self-compassion, and psychosocial theories of successful aging. Methods: = 34 participants. We collected quantitative data at baseline and quantitative and qualitative data post-intervention by telephone. Findings: Overall, our program was deemed to be feasible and acceptable by participants. Pre- to post-CONNECT, we found significant improvements in depression (d = 2.4), emotional support (d = 5.2), mental health literacy (d = 3.2), and psychological flexibility (d = 7.0), indicating large treatment effects. Through conventional content analysis of post-CONNECT individual interviews we developed three main themes: Accessibility (sub-themes: join from the comfort and anonymity of the telephone lines; reduction of age-related barriers), Connectedness (sub-themes: connection to group facilitators; group members; and new information), and Perceived Program Benefits (sub-themes: behavioral changes; emotional and cognitive changes; enhanced mindful awareness). Discussion: The CONNECT Program is a novel, accessible, and acceptable intervention that demonstrates promise in improving key social and mental health indicators. The findings from this pilot study will inform a future trial comparing The CONNECT Program with standard community programs typically offered to older adults in these provinces. This trial will also evaluate two delivery modes (telephone and videoconferencing) to compare their relative impact and feasibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Public HealthSame topicMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsFrench-language works237,207