Overlooked and underserved: How inclusive education oversights exclude Black students
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Empirical research about equity in schools seldom investigates how the intersectionality of race and disability shapes Canadian educational trajectories. This article shows how disability‐related school procedures impede Black students' learning opportunities. The theory of racialized organizations posits that institutions such as schools reproduce societal racial hierarchies through seemingly race‐neutral processes. Using an intersectional lens and the theory of racialized organizations, this article presents the findings of a qualitative study focusing on Black students' experiences. The analysis is drawn from interviews and focus groups conducted with 60 participants in Nova Scotia, Canada between 2018 and 2019. Participants' narratives revealed that school professionals could better support Black students by ending the misapplication of Individual Program Plans (IPPs) and addressing Black learners' learning disabilities and mental health needs through collaborative alliances with caregivers. This article shows that tighter coupling between anti‐racist and inclusive education policies and disability‐related procedures is needed to achieve equitable access to education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it