MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414040602 · doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvaf179

Quality of life in patients with overt hypothyroidism: a systematic review

2025· article· en· W4414040602 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marianne Thvilum, Sara Marcus Lind, Eva Ebbehøj, Søren Gregersen, Diana Grove‐Laugesen

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Endocrinology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality of life (healthcare)DiseaseMEDLINEMeta-analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Persistent symptoms and impaired quality of life (QoL) in hypothyroidism despite treatment with levothyroxine (LT4) receive increasing attention. We aimed at reviewing QoL in long-term treated hypothyroidism. DESIGN: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The systematic literature search "hypothyroidism AND quality of life" was conducted in PubMed and Embase. We considered studies on QoL in adults with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) or congenital hypothyroidism (CH), treated with levothyroxine for 6 months. Seven hundred and ninety-seven articles were screened for title-abstract, and 52 were assessed by full-text evaluation. Seventeen articles met eligibility criteria and were included. We summarize study finding within the domains mental well-being, physical well-being, and social role supported by meta-analyses. Studies were evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Two meta-analyses were performed using random effects model. RESULTS: Fourteen studies included patients with HT, and 3 evaluated QoL in CH. Mental and physical well-being was impaired in 10 studies, and social role impairments were detected in 7 studies. Study design was to some degree flawed in 13 studies, potentially hampering conclusions. The most frequent methodological issues were incomparable groups or lack of information on potential confounders like body mass index or comorbidity. However, when focusing on the methodologically most robust studies, conclusions remained and were supported by meta-analyses. CONCLUSION: Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis, despite methodological concerns in the available literature, QoL in patients with hypothyroidism is impaired. Future studies should address potential residual bias displayed and explore the impact of disease etiology, duration, and timing of diagnosis in relation to comorbidity, to reveal groups of patients susceptible to inadequate treatment response and guide our way to improve QoL in hypothyroidism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.014
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of EndocrinologySame topicThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207