MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414060560 · doi:10.1186/s40066-025-00546-z

Retail store governance models in remote Indigenous communities across Canada: a media analysis

2025· article· en· W4414060560 on OpenAlex
Camille Slack, Sonia Wesche, Ana María Peredo, Tiff‐Annie Kenny

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAgriculture & Food Security · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of OttawaGlobal Affairs Canada
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsIndigenousCorporate governancePopulationFood policyFood systemsGrey literatureFood insecurity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In remote Indigenous communities across Canada, food insecurity is shaped by systemic inequities rooted in colonial governance structures and compounded by geographic isolation, high operational costs, limited retail competition, and small population sizes. While these material challenges are well-documented, less attention has been given to the governance of retail food systems and the ownership models that mediate access, affordability, and community control. In contrast to Australia, where Indigenous retail governance has received growing academic focus, Canadian research in this area remains sparse—despite growing public discourse and recurring media coverage. Here, we survey news articles to (1) Describe retail food governance structures and their impacts (particularly on: ownership models, community engagement, food affordability, and food accessibility) in remote Indigenous communities, focusing on community perspectives, and (2) Develop a Framework of Retail Food Models in Remote Indigenous Communities in Canada. We conducted a systematic media analysis of news articles extracted from the Canadian Major Dailies database (via search string; n = 148) and Google News search (using 10 searches × 4 pages/10 results; n = 400). Using a double screening process, we applied structured inclusion and exclusion criteria to select articles that addressed the current governance structures of retail stores in remote, Indigenous communities across Canada. We used a hybrid coding approach based on four main themes: (1) store ownership models; (2) community engagement; (3) food affordability; and (4) food accessibility. We purposefully extracted direct quotes from the news articles to retain community perspectives and minimize journalistic bias. Of the 70 articles, 16 discussed store ownership models, 14 discussed community engagement, 22 discussed food affordability, and 18 discussed food accessibility. Findings were used to develop a Framework of Retail Food Models in Remote Indigenous Communities in Canada. There is growing interest in Indigenous-owned grocery stores and co-ops across Canada. Many communities use Indigenous-led governance initiatives to strengthen local economies through retail food systems. While these initiatives are not widely documented in academic literature, news media offers an important source for new insights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it