SLC4A1 mutations that cause distal renal tubular acidosis alter cytoplasmic pH and cellular autophagy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Distal renal tubular acidosis (dRTA) is a disorder characterized by the inability of the collecting duct system to secrete acids during metabolic acidosis. The pathophysiology of dominant or recessive SLC4A1 variant related dRTA has been linked with the mis trafficking defect of mutant kAE1 protein. However, in vivo studies in kAE1 R607H dRTA mice and humans have revealed a complex pathophysiology implicating a loss of kAE1-expressing intercalated cells and intracellular relocation of the H+-ATPase in the remaining type-A intercalated cells. These cells also displayed accumulation of ubiquitin and p62 autophagy markers. The highly active transport properties of collecting duct cells require the maintenance of cellular energy and homeostasis, a process dependent on intracellular pH. Therefore, we hypothesized that the expression of dRTA variants affect intracellular pH and autophagy pathways. In this study, we report the characterization of newly identified dRTA variants and provide evidence of abnormal autophagy and degradative pathways in mouse inner medullary collecting duct cells and kidneys from mice expressing kAE1 R607H dRTA mutant protein. We show that reduced transport activity of the kAE1 variants correlated with increased cytosolic pH, reduced ATP synthesis, attenuated downstream autophagic pathways pertaining to the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes and/or lysosomal degradative activity. Our study elucidated a close relationship between the expression of defective kAE1 proteins, reduced mitochondrial activity and decreased autophagy and protein degradative flux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".