The Brain-Gut-Microbiome Axis Across the Life Continuum and the Role of Microbes in Maintaining the Balance of Health
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a growing body of evidence that the interaction between various microbial organisms and the human host can affect various physical and even mental health conditions. Bidirectional communication occurs between the brain and the gut microbiome, referred to as the brain-gut-microbiome axis. During aging, changes occur to the gut microbiome due to various events and factors such as the mode of delivery at birth, exposure to medications (e.g., antibiotics), environmental exposures, diet, and host genetics. Connections to the brain-gut-microbiome axis through different systems also change during aging, leading to the development of chronic diseases. Disruption of the gut microbiome, known as dysbiosis, can lead to a reduction in beneficial bacteria and a corresponding increase in more harmful or even pathogenic bacteria. This imbalance may predispose or contribute to the development of various health conditions and illnesses. Targeted treatment of the gut microbiome and the brain-gut-microbiome axis may assist in the overall management of these various ailments. The purpose of this review is to describe the changes that occur in the gut microbiome throughout life, and to highlight the risk factors for microbial dysbiosis. We discuss the different health conditions experienced at various stages of life, and how dysbiosis may contribute to the clinical presentation of these diseases. Modulation of the gut microbiome and the brain-gut-microbiome axis may therefore be beneficial in the management of various ailments. This review also explores how various therapeutics may be used to target the gut microbiome. Gut biotics and microbial metabolites such as short chain fatty acids may serve as additional forms of treatment. Overall, the targeting of gut health may be an important strategy in the treatment of different medical conditions, with nutritional modulation of the brain-gut-microbiome axis also representing a novel strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".