MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414071349 · doi:10.47363/jmhc/2025(7)315

Impact of Early-Life Antibiotic Exposure on the Risk of Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2025· article· en· W4414071349 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fatima Alam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicine and HealthCare · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialOverweightObesityRisk assessmentEndocrine disruptorAntibioticsGut flora

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Childhood obesity is a growing global health challenge linked to long-term metabolic, cardiovascular, and psychosocial consequences. Emerging evidence suggests that early-life antibiotic exposure, a common disruptor of gut microbiota during critical developmental windows, may increase the risk of overweight and obesity.Objective: To systematically evaluate and quantify the association between antibiotic exposure in the first two years of life and the subsequent risk of overweight or obesity in childhood, with subgroup analyses by antibiotic type, timing, and sex.Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January 15, 2025, without language restrictions. Eligible studies included prospective or retrospective cohorts assessing systemic antibiotic exposure in children aged ≤24 months with later overweight/obesity outcomes. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers, and study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). Random-effects models were used to generate pooled effect estimates, with heterogeneity assessed via I² statistics.Results: Three high-quality cohort studies (n = 365,306 participants) from China, Canada, and the USA met inclusion criteria. Antibiotic exposure within the first 24 months was consistently associated with increased BMI z-scores and higher odds of overweight/obesity. The largest study (n = 362,550) showed a dose–response relationship, with incremental BMI increases per additional antibiotic course (p < 0.001). Broad-spectrum antibiotics were linked to slightly higher BMI z-scores compared to narrow-spectrum agents, and cephalosporins/macrolides exhibited stronger associations. A sex-specific effect was noted in one study, with significant risk elevation among boys (aOR = 5.35, 95% CI: 1.94–14.72). Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I² range: 38–52%), but the direction of effect remained consistent across subgroups.Conclusion: Early-life antibiotic exposure, particularly broad-spectrum and repeated courses, is associated with an increased risk of overweight and obesity in childhood. These findings highlight the need for cautious antibiotic prescribing in infancy as part of obesity prevention strategies. Future research integrating microbiome profiling is warranted to elucidate causal pathways and identify high-risk subgroups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.042
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicine and HealthCareSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207