MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414078032 · doi:10.1016/j.aqrep.2025.103085

Antibacterial effects of chebulagic acid and chebulinic acid isolated from Terminalia chebula against Vibrio parahaemolyticus

2025· article· en· W4414078032 on OpenAlexaff
Luyao Wang, Shi-Lu Huang, Yu-Wei Zhang, Xiaoxin Huang, Fuzai Sun, Yao‐Wu Fu, Qi-Zhong Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueAquaculture Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceKey Technologies Research and Development Program of GuangzhouGuangdong Science and Technology DepartmentGuangzhou Municipal Science and Technology BureauDepartment of Agriculture of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTerminalia chebulaVibrio parahaemolyticusAntibacterial activityMinimum bactericidal concentrationMinimum inhibitory concentrationBacteriaPseudomonas aeruginosaVibrio vulnificus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vibrio parahaemolyticus (VP) is a common pathogenic bacterium in marine animals, causing significant economic losses to the aquaculture industry annually. There is an urgent need to develop environmentally friendly, safe and effective antibacterial agents. In this study, two active compounds were isolated and purified from the ethanol extract of Terminalia chebula and identified as chebulagic acid (CAA) and chebulinic acid (CIA) using mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The antibacterial results showed that both CAA and CIA exhibited a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 25 mg/L and a minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of 1250 mg/L against VP. The two compounds significantly increased the extracellular levels of AKP, nucleic acids, soluble proteins, and glucose of VP. Scanning electron microscopy results indicated that both active compounds significantly altered the cell morphology of VP, causing cell shrinkage and deformtion. Additionally, the two compounds exhibited potent inhibitory effects against several other pathogenic bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Aeromonas versonii, A. hydrophila , V. alginolyticus , and V. vulnificus . The 96-h half-lethal concentrations of CAA and CIA on Ctenogobius giurinus were 561.653 mg/L and 525.011 mg/L respectively. These values were 22.5 and 21.0 times higher than their MIC against VP, respectively. Therefore, CAA and CIA, derived from T. chebula extract, represent promising candidate molecules for the prevention and control of vibriosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAquaculture ReportsSame topicPhytochemicals and Medicinal PlantsFrench-language works237,207