MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414078370 · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf314

Different sources and dosages of zinc oxide and copper influence growth performance and intestinal health of post-weaning piglets

2025· article· en· W4414078370 on OpenAlexafffund
Clara Negrini, Hadhemi Baccouri, Alessandra Monteiro, Luca Lo Verso, Paolo Trevisi, Marie-Pierre Létourneau-Montminy, Frédéric Guay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsZincWeaningDoseFecesCopperBioavailabilityBasal (medicine)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In pig production, weaning is a critical period where piglets face several environmental stressors. This transition leads to a significant growth reduction and can result in digestive disorders, including diarrhea. To formulate a feed that meets zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu) requirements during the weaning period while minimizing their release into the environment, it became evident that a more bioavailable micro-mineral supplement is necessary. This project aimed to evaluate two sources of Zn (standard oxides and potentiated oxide (ZnO)) and Cu (sulphate and monovalent Cu), on the growth performance, intestinal health (inflammation, barrier function, mucosal stress), and microbiota abundance and composition of weaned piglets. At weaning (21 days), 135 piglets were selected. The experimental diets were composed as follows: basal diet with the addition of: 1) Negative control (NC): 150 mg/kg ZnO and 150 mg/kg Cu (sulphate); 2) Positive control (PC): 2,600 mg/kg ZnO and 150 mg/kg Cu (sulphate); 3) SpEU: 150 mg/kg potentiated form of ZnO (HiZox) and 150 mg/kg monovalent Cu oxide (CoRouge); 4) SpCA: 300 mg/kg potentiated ZnO and 150 mg/kg monovalent Cu. The experimental diets were provided for 14 days (phase 1) post-weaning. Subsequently, all piglets received the same diets for phase 2 (14-28 days) and phase 3 (28-42 days). Piglets were weighed at weaning and on days (d) 14, 28, and 42. At d7 and d14, blood was collected for intestinal health status marker analyses. At d14, fecal samples were collected to assess the effects on microbiota, calprotectin, and neopterin. In the first phase, average daily gain (ADG) and average daily feed intake (P = 0.001) resulted in higher outcomes in the PC group. Feed conversion was higher in the SpEU and SpCA groups (P = 0.002). For the overall performance, however, highest ADG were observed in both the PC and SpCA groups (P = 0.001). The citrulline was found to be higher in the NC group (P = 0.002). The diamine oxidase was higher in SpCA than PC group (P = 0.008). Zinc concentrations in feces and serum were higher for PC treatment (P = 0.001, P = 0.037, respectively). From the results it was possible to confirm the positive effects of the administration of 300 mg/kg of the potentiated ZnO and 150 mg/kg monovalent copper oxide could be a valid substitute of pharmacological ZnO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207