MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414078879 · doi:10.1016/j.cont.2025.102082

158 - Prostate organoid model as a new model to study the crosstalk between epithelial and stromal cells in benign prostate hyperplasia

2025· article· en· W4414078879 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S Lasri, Philippe Cammisotto, Lysanne Campeau

Bibliographic record

VenueContinence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStromal cellOrganoidProstateHyperplasiaProstate cancerFibrosisCalponinLNCaP

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypothesis / aims of study Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is characterized by inflammation, fibrosis of the extracellular matrix and hypercontractility of stromal tissue. In urological diseases with similar symptoms, the ratio of pro nerve growth factor (proNGF) to its mature isoform (NGF) is increased and considered a marker of inflammation. Murine models of diabetic bladder dysfunction display the same imbalance. Chronic treatment with THX-B, an antagonist of the p75NTR receptor of proNGF, restored the neurotrophin ratio and improved bladder contractile parameters. On the other hand, organoids are tridimensional cellular structures which reproduce the interactions between different cell types present in the same organ, removing the problems associated with co-culturing cells in 2 dimensions. They have been widely used to study prostate diseases but mainly in cancer research. We here report a model of organoids from prostate cells to assess the role of neurotrophins in BPH. Study design, materials and methods Whole prostate tissue of Sprague-Dawley rats was digested with collagenase type II. Epithelial and stromal cells (50/50) were seeded in non-adherent wells. After 48 hours, the structure of organoids was examined by confocal microscopy using smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC) and cytokeratin 17 (CK17) to highlight respectively stromal and epithelial cells. In the structure. BPH was induced with hyperglycemic medium (25 mM) combined or not with elevated testosterone concentrations (500 nM). THX-B, the antagonist of p75NTR proinflammatory receptor, was incubated in all conditions. Neurotrophin levels were measured by Elisa. Immunoblottings and RTqPCR were performed on cell extracts to assess inflammatory, contractility and fibrosis markers. Results Light microscopy revealed the organisation of cells into spheroids. Confocal microscopy showed epithelial and stromal cells mingled at the surface of a hollow structure, as revealed by CK17 (epithelial) and SMMHC (stromal) markers. Spheroids released NGF and proNGF in the culture medium. NGF secretion was not affected nor by high glucose nor testosterone combined or not, neither by THX-B. ProNGF levels were increased by testosterone and high glucose and reverted to contorl values by THX-B. Inflammatory markers IL1, IL-6 and TNF-alpha expression was unchanged in all conditions. Myosin, smoothelin and actin were unaffected. Interpretation of results Epithelial cells secrete many factors that directly target stromal cells. Co-culture in the form of organoids provide a new tool to examine how different cell type react in culture conditions mimicking a pathological settings, such as hyperglycemia and/or hypertestosteronemia. Concluding message Organoid culture of prostate cells was reproducible and constitute a valid model to study prostate cell interaction in BPH in the context of neurotrophin secretions. Funding Canadian urological asociation Clinical Trial No Subjects Animal Species rat Ethics Committee Canadian Council for Animal Care. All protocols and the Animal Ethics Committee of McGill University (Quebec, Canada).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContinence→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→