MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414081270 · doi:10.1167/iovs.66.12.20

Novel <i>Grm6</i> Variant in a <i>no b-wave (nob)</i> Mouse Model: Phenotype Characterization and Gene Therapy

2025· article· en· W4414081270 on OpenAlexaff
Pei‐Hsuan Lin, Eugene Yu‐Chuan Kang, Neoklis Makrides, Winston Lee, Yun-Ju Tseng, Peiliang Wu, John Peregrin, Emmet A. Sherman, Jiaxu Wang, Theresa C. Swayne, Tai‐De Li, Melina A. Agosto, Janet R. Sparrow, Xin Zhang, Stephen H. Tsang, Nan‐Kai Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Eye InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsPhenotypeGenetic enhancementTransduction (biophysics)GeneClinical phenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To characterize a no b-wave (nob) mouse model of congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB) caused by a Grm6 variant that disrupts photoreceptor-to-bipolar cell signaling. Additionally, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of gene therapy in restoring visual function. Methods: The nob mouse was generated through selective breeding to regenerate the nob phenotype. Adeno-associated viruses encoding Grm6 and GFP, driven by two promoters (hGRM6 and CMV), were administered to nob mice at postnatal days 5 (P5) and 30 (P30), respectively. Electroretinography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were conducted three months after gene therapy. Results: The nob phenotype was successfully regenerated, and a homozygous missense variant c.1037G>A (p.Arg346His) in Grm6 was identified as the causal variant. Scotopic b waves were absent, whereas a waves remained normal, indicating intact rod function but impaired bipolar cell function. SD-OCT revealed thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer and outer plexiform layer (OPL) in affected mice. Immunofluorescence and immunoblotting revealed decreased mGluR6 levels and associated signaling proteins. Gene therapy restored mGluR6 expression and reestablished synaptic protein localization in the OPL, although improvements in b/a ratios and OPL thickness were modest. Notably, the hGRM6 promoter at P5 was more effective at restoring OPL. Conclusions: We identified a new nob mouse model that mimics the CSNB phenotype in human patients. Whereas gene therapy successfully restored mGluR6 expression, functional improvements were limited. Early treatment using a specific promoter is critical, and increasing transduction efficiency may improve gene therapy strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual ScienceSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207