Epistasis at the cell surface: what is the role of Erg3 loss-of-function in acquired echinocandin resistance?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Echinocandins, which target the fungal β-1,3-glucan synthase (Fks), are essential for treating invasive fungal infections, yet resistance is increasingly reported. While resistance typically arises through mutations in Fks hotspots, emerging evidence suggests a contributing role of changes in membrane sterol composition due to ERG3 mutations. Here, we present a clinical case of Nakaseomyces glabratus ( Candida glabrata ) in which combined mutations in ERG3 and FKS2 , but not FKS2 alone, appear to confer echinocandin resistance. Integrated analyses reveal a recurrent association between Erg3 loss-of-function and echinocandin resistance mediated by Fks variation across Candida species, but exclude Erg3 loss-of-function as an independent resistance mechanism. Advances in Fks structural biology and insights into echinocandin-Fks interactions support a model of epistatic cross-talk between membrane sterols and Fks function. Understanding this interaction is crucial, as it may underlie not only acquired echinocandin resistance but also the broader development of multidrug resistance across major antifungal drug classes. IMPORTANCE A clinical case in which the combination of variation in a β‑1,3‑glucan synthase-encoding gene ( FKS2 ) and the sterol desaturase-encoding gene ERG3 seems to underlie echinocandin resistance, prompted us to hypothesize that membrane sterol changes may modulate, rather than independently cause, Fks‑linked resistance. We were able to explore this hypothesis due to recent developments in the field, such as the release of the FungAMR database, which enables global co‑occurrence analyses; AI‑driven variant effect predictors such as Evolutionary Scale Modeling (ESM) that can explore the impact of thousands of ERG3 alleles; the cryo‑EM resolution of the Fks1 protein; and the first mechanistic model of echinocandin‑Fks1 binding. Together, these advances provide the structural and computational framework needed to delineate our hypothesis that specific sterol variants might influence β‑1,3‑glucan synthase function and drug binding. Further surveillance of this potentially epistatic interaction can be of significant clinical importance amid rising multidrug‑resistant infections, as overlooking such interactions could lead to under‑calling resistance and misguided therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".