MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414083751 · doi:10.1002/pros.70045

USPSTF Recommendation Against PSA Screening vs. Stage and Cancer‐Specific Mortality in Localized Prostate Cancer

2025· article· en· W4414083751 on OpenAlexaff
Fabian Falkenbach, Francesco Di Bello, Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda, Mattia Longoni, Andrea Marmiroli, Quynh Chi Le, Zhe Tian, Jordan A. Goyal, Nicola Longo, Salvatore Micali, Alberto Briganti, Ottavio De Cobelli, Felix K.‐H. Chun, Fred Saad, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Lars Budäus, Markus Graefen, Pierre I. Karakiewicz

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Prostate · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerStage (stratigraphy)Prostate-specific antigenProstate diseaseIncidence (geometry)DiseaseMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The USPSTF recommendation against PSA screening (RAPS) in 2012 resulted in unfavorable changes in prostate cancer (PCa) outcomes. However, the effect on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in localized PCa has not been assessed. METHODS: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2021), we identified patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) or radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized PCa. Time trends were examined using least-squares linear regression. Multivariable Cox regression was used to study the association between RAPS and PCa-mortality. RESULTS: Of 270,092 patients aged < 75 years, 191,621 (70.1%) were treated before and 78,471 (29.1%) in the RAPS era. CSM at 6 years of follow-up was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6, 1.7) before and 1.9% (95%CI: 1.8, 2.0) in the RAPS era (p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox models adjusted to patient characteristics, RAPS era independently predicted 1.2-fold higher CSM overall (95%CI: 1.1, 1.3; p < 0.001), 1.3-fold higher CSM in RP-patients (95%CI: 1.1, 1.4; p < 0.001), and 1.1-fold higher CSM in RT-patients (95%CI: 1.02, 1.2; p = 0.02) aged < 75 years. Of 33,688 patients aged ≥ 75 years, 12,485 (37.1%) were treated before and 21,203 (62.9%) in the RAPS era. CSM at 6 years of follow-up was 4.2% (95%CI: 3.8, 4.6) before and 4.8% (95%CI: 4.5, 5.1) in the RAPS era (p = 0.002). In multivariable Cox models adjusted to patient characteristics, RAPS era did not predict higher CSM overall, in RP-patients, or in RT-patients (all p ≥ 0.5) aged ≥ 75 years. Limitations include changes in early detection and disease management over time, which might have impacted CSM as well. CONCLUSIONS: The USPSTF RAPS introduction resulted in a 1.2-fold higher CSM in localized PCa patients aged < 75 years, but not in patients aged ≥ 75 years. The time trend analysis suggested that this negative effect has become increasingly pronounced since the USPSTF RAPS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.042
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.131
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0420.131
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0070.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe ProstateSame topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207