MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414084772 · doi:10.1097/pcc.0000000000003825

Timing of Death in Children Referred for Intensive Care With Sepsis: Comparison of Two Cohorts in the United Kingdom, 2005–2011 vs. 2018–2023

2025· article· en· W4414084772 on OpenAlexaff
Maile Wedgwood, Elise Randle, Maik Honsel, Padmanabhan Ramnarayan, Mark Peters

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntensive careResuscitationSepsisMEDLINECause of deathCardiopulmonary resuscitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To review the timing of death in children with sepsis referred for intensive care, 2018-2023, and compare with our previous 2005-2011 practice. We hypothesized that most deaths occur within 24 hours of referral to the PICU, with many before PICU admission. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We reviewed referrals to the Children's Acute Transport Service (CATS), North Thames regional pediatric intensive care transport service in the United Kingdom, between January 2018 and March 2023. We included referrals of children (younger than 16 yr) with a working diagnosis of "sepsis," "severe sepsis," "septicemia," or "septic shock." The primary outcome measure was time to death up to a year after referral. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Over the 62-month study period, 11,231 referrals were made to CATS, and 330 (3%) met the study inclusion criteria. Outcome data were available on 272, of whom 29 (11%) died in the first year after referral, which compares favorably with our 2005-2011 cohort from the same service in which the 1-year mortality was 21% (130/627): mean difference 10% (95% CI, 4.8-14.6%), p value equals 0.0003. Eighteen of the 29 deaths occurred in the first 24 hours after referral. Amongst children with comorbidities 12 of 139 (9%) died compared to 6 of 133 (5%) previously healthy children ( p = 0.22 Fisher exact test, odds ratio [OR] 2.0 with 95% CI, 0.73-5.5). By 1 year, mortality in children with comorbidities was 19 of 139 (13.9%) vs. mortality in previously healthy children of 10 of 133 (7.5%) ( p = 0.12; OR 1.8 [95% CI, 0.82-4.1]). CONCLUSIONS: In 2018-2023, the proportion of referrals for PICU retrieval with a clinical diagnosis of "sepsis" was low at 3%. As with our 2005-2011 cohort, most deaths occurred within 24 hours of first referral. Therefore, early recognition and resuscitation still have the greatest potential for improving sepsis outcomes, which has implications for clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207