MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414085806 · doi:10.1111/bjh.70061

<scp>UK</scp> recommendations for chimerism testing and monitoring following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation <scp>(HSCT</scp> ): Best practice consensus guidelines from the British Society for Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapies ( <scp>BSBMTCT</scp> ), <scp>NHS</scp> England Genomic Laboratory Hub ( <scp>GLH</scp> ) Haematological Malignancies Working Group, <scp>UK</scp> Cancer Genetics Group ( <scp>UKCGG</scp> ) and the <scp>UK</scp> National External Quality Assessment Service for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping ( <scp>UK NEQAS LI</scp> )

2025· article· en· W4414085806 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Clark, Hazel J. Clouston, Kanchan Rao, Najeem Folarin, Josu de la Fuente, Angela Hamblin, Eduardo Olavarría, Debbie Richardson, Polly Talley, Victoria Potter, Justin Loke, Terri McVeigh, John A. Snowden

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Haematology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransplantationMinimal residual diseaseDiseaseStem cellHematopoietic stem cell transplantationAuditClinical PracticeDosing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), important clinical decisions depend upon assessment of chimerism, including immunosuppressant dosing and donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI), which in turn can have major impacts on disease control, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), immunity and ultimately patient survival. There is a complex range of clinical and laboratory procedural considerations including methodology of testing, types of cell subset selection, frequency of testing, urgency of turnaround times (TATs), interplay with measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring and duration of testing post-transplant. These aspects are routinely adapted according to disease indication, patient characteristics, donor source and intensity of transplant technique. To encourage the harmonisation of clinical and laboratory practice in the United Kingdom, we held a national workshop meeting to bring together key stakeholders to review the current literature with a view to producing a state-of-the-art position paper. Here, we present best practice consensus recommendations and identify key areas for future audit and research from the UK Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG), NHS England Genomic Laboratory Hub (GLH) Haematological Oncology Malignancies Working Group, UK National External Quality Assessment Service for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping (UK NEQAS LI) and the British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (BSBMTCT).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of HaematologySame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207