ANALISIS KINERJA PEGAWAI IMPLIKASI GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN, MOTIVASI DAN KOMUNIKASI ANTAR PERSONIL (Studi Kasus pada Guru SMA Negeri 1 Meureudu Kabupaten Pidie Jaya)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studying teacher performance issues is never-ending, besides there are still crucial problems related to regulations that often occur in the field of education. This study limits the performance of the implications of leadership style, teacher work motivation and interpersonal communication. Applying an associative method with a quantitative approach to a sample of 64 teachers at SMA Negeri 1 Meureudu, Pidie Jaya Regency. With path analysis, the following findings were obtained: 1) teacher performance has a positive and significant contribution from the leadership style factor, teacher work motivation and communication, both directly and indirectly because of the causal relationship between the three factors. The contributions are 35.44 percent, 36.34 percent and 40.25 percent respectively. 2) Simultaneously, leadership style, work motivation and interpersonal communication contribute to increasing teacher performance by 43.8 percent. 3). There is a causal relationship between the leadership style factor, teacher work motivation and interpersonal communication with a moderate category.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it