MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414089341 · doi:10.7771/3067-4883.1745

Integrating Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Resilience in the Pursuit of Sustainable Built Environments

2025· article· en· W4414089341 on OpenAlexaffabout
Zahra Jandaghian, Abhishek Gaur, Abdelaziz Laouadi, Henry Lu, Michael Lacasse

Bibliographic record

VenueCIB Conferences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLand Use and Ecosystem Services
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResilience (materials science)Urban resilienceUrban planningGreen infrastructureProcess (computing)Adaptation (eye)Climate changeClimate resilienceStormwater management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urban areas increasingly face climate-related challenges such as extreme heat, flooding, and biodiversity loss, that demand innovative, resilient solutions. Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) have emerged as a transformative approach for adapting urban areas, by integrating natural processes into urban planning process to enhance resilience and sustainability. In this paper, the role of NBS in promoting urban resilience is examined, aligning closely with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 11, which is intended to alter cities to become inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable. Key NBS strategies—such as green roofs, urban forests, bioswales, permeable pavements, sustainable building materials having high solar reflectivity— offer climate adaptation benefits such as temperature regulation and stormwater management, improved air quality, carbon sequestering, encouragement of biodiversity, and the promotion of social well-being. The implementation of NBS faces however, multiple challenges, including policy, financial, technical, and social barriers. In this paper each of these obstacles are addresses and the need for a paradigm shift is emphasized to overcome such barriers that would involve policy incentives, hybrid solutions, and community-driven strategies. Through a review of case studies, taken from Toronto, Detroit, Singapore, Malmö, and Rotterdam, are used to illustrates how hybrid NBS approaches, in which ecological processes have been combined with traditional engineering, have successfully used to address specific urban challenges. These cases demonstrate the potential of NBS to deliver multifunctional benefits, especially when implemented through cross-sector collaboration and supported by adaptive management frameworks. By providing useful outcomes that can be turned directly into actionable insights for policymakers, urban planners, and stakeholders, the results described in this permit advocating for the integration of NBS as a pathway to sustainable, resilient urban landscapes. Indeed, it is shown that the implementation of NBS enhance urban adaptability and contribute significantly to global sustainability goals, offering scalable models for cities worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCIB ConferencesSame topicLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesFrench-language works237,207