Impact of Plasmodiophora brassicae on Canola Root and Rhizosphere Microbiomes and Its Implications for Clubroot Biocontrol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clubroot, caused by the obligate parasite Plasmodiophora brassicae, is a soilborne disease affecting canola (Brassica napus) and other crucifers. Although planting resistant cultivars remains the primary strategy for managing clubroot, the emergence of resistance-breaking P. brassicae pathotypes continues to threaten canola production. In this context, soil and root microorganisms may play a role in suppressing the disease. This study investigated the impact of P. brassicae infection on the microbial communities of soil, seeds, roots, and the rhizosphere in susceptible and resistant canola lines, with the aim of analyzing host–pathogen–microbiome interactions and identifying microbial taxa potentially associated with disease resistance. Our findings showed that resistant canola lines inoculated with P. brassicae (pathotype 3A) exhibited reduced disease severity compared to their susceptible counterparts. Diversity analyses of microbial communities revealed that clubroot-resistant canola lines tended to maintain more stable and diverse fungal communities, with a higher Shannon index than susceptible lines. Inoculation with P. brassicae induced more pronounced changes in the root microbiome than in the rhizosphere. Additionally, the seed microbiomes of resistant and susceptible lines displayed distinct bacterial and fungal profiles, suggesting that clubroot susceptibility may influence seed-associated microbial community composition. Differential abundance analysis of root and rhizosphere microbiomes indicated that certain microbial taxa, including bacterial genera such as Acidovorax, Bacillus, Cupriavidus, Cytophaga, Duganella, Flavobacterium, Fluviicola, Luteimonas, Methylotenera, Pedobacter, and Peredibacter, as well as fungal genera such as Aspergillus, Candida, Fusicolla, Paecilomyces, and Rhizophlyctis, may be recruited or enriched in resistant canola lines following P. brassicae inoculation, potentially contributing to reduced clubroot severity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".