MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414095032 · doi:10.1177/23814683251364883

Development and Acceptability Testing of a Patient Decision Aid on Levodopa Intestinal Gel for Parkinson Disease

2025· article· en· W4414095032 on OpenAlex
Andréanne Tanguay, Caroline Cayer, Isabelle Beaulieu‐Boire

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMDM Policy & Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsHôpital FleurimontCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseHealth professionalsHealth carePatient careDecision aidsMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by motor and nonmotor symptoms that worsen over time. In some cases, an advanced treatment may be needed. The use of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is one of these options. However, deciding whether to receive it can be difficult. A patient decision aid (PDA), a tool designed to inform about treatment options, can help and promote patients’ participation in decision making. Objectives This study was conducted to develop a PDA on LCIG and assess its acceptability. Methods The International Patient Decision Aid Standards framework was used to develop the PDA. An advisory committee ( n = 5) gave feedback on the PDA prototype. Acceptability was evaluated using a cross-sectional descriptive design. A convenience sample of 36 participants (including persons with PD receiving and not receiving LCIG, caregivers, and health care professionals) was used. Acceptability data, sociodemographics, and health literacy were collected using questionnaires and a focus group. Results Sample characteristics were a mean age of 64.4 y ( s = 14 y), university level of education (46.7%), and duration of illness of less than 10 y (80%). The health literacy score was judged as very good ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> = 55.2/70, s = 7.3). Qualitative data analysis allowed for final adjustments to the published PDA version. Conclusions. This study is the first to report the development of a PDA on LCIG and its acceptability testing. Participants found the PDA to be useful and would recommend it. All health care professionals indicated they intended to use it in their practice. More research will be needed to evaluate the PDA’s implementation and its effects on users. Highlights Deciding whether to opt for an advanced Parkinson’s disease treatment such as levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel can be challenging for many patients. A patient decision aid on levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel for Parkinson’s disease persons, caregivers, and health care professionals was developed to support a decision-making process. This article summarizes the steps used for its development and its acceptability testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.091
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.091
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.229
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it