MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414098749 · doi:10.3390/psychiatryint6030111

Efficacy and Safety of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2025· article· en· W4414098749 on OpenAlexaff
Stanley Wong, Nicholas Fabiano, Carl Zhou, Brandon Luu, Risa Shorr, Sarah Slassi, Marco Solmi, Ishrat Husain, Michael Mak

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatry International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityWestern UniversityCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthOttawa HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstructive sleep apneaRandomized controlled trialPlaceboMeta-analysisAdverse effectStrictly standardized mean differenceRespiratory disturbance indexContinuous positive airway pressureSubgroup analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To review and synthesize the current literature of clinical trials that investigated the efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in people with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Method: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which GLP-1RAs were used to treat people diagnosed with OSA. This systematic review and meta-analysis complied with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024537280). A random effects model was used for meta-analysis to assess changes in OSA as measured by the apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) compared to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or placebo controls. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) were computed for continuous and binary outcomes. Variability between studies, risk of bias, subgroup analysis, and leave-one-out analysis were completed. Results: Five studies were included (N = 1023; 511 GLP-1RA and 512 control). Two trials used tirzepatide and four studies used liraglutide as the GLP-1RA. Six studies showed a decrease in AHI with an SMD of −14.5 events per hour (95%CI = −24.73 to −4.21; I2 = 96.3%). When compared to placebo, GLP-1RA treatment had a significant reduction in AHI (SMD = −0.69; 95%CI = −1.10 to −0.26; p = 0.001; I2 = 88.0%). When compared to CPAP, no significant difference in the reduction of AHI was found. No evidence of publication bias was found. Compared to control, there was no significant difference in serious adverse events (RR = 0.89; 95%CI = 0.50 to 1.57; p = 0.68; I2 = 20.93%). Conclusions: People with psychiatric disorders may also experience comorbid OSA that can impact their quality of life, which may perpetuate psychiatric symptoms of depression. GLP-1RAs may provide therapeutic potential in the treatment of OSA in addition to their cardioprotective effects. Current studies are limited by small sample sizes, lack of blinding, and short duration. Future studies will require further investigation in long-term efficacy and safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatry InternationalSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207