MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414108081 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2025-0082

Development and application of a 30 MeV cyclotron-based neutron source for neutron imaging and verification of D1S activation analysis system

2025· article· en· W4414108081 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
K.H. Lee, Bongki Jung, Jong‐Chul Lee, Soobin Lim, Jeong Hoon Park, Jong-Yul Kim, Myung Kook Moon, Changhee Lee, Pilsoo Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Foundation of KoreaKorea Atomic Energy Research Institute
KeywordsNeutron sourceNeutronBonner sphereNeutron imagingNeutron stimulated emission computed tomographySpectrometerMonte Carlo methodNeutron time-of-flight scatteringNeutron cross sectionNeutron scattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A compact neutron source based on a 30 MeV cyclotron was successfully developed at the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute and applied to neutron imaging and preliminary design studies for fusion-related activation analysis. The developed neutron source demonstrated stable neutron yields exceeding 1.6 × 10 12 n/s under proton beam conditions of 30 MeV and 10 µA. Neutron measurements using Bonner sphere spectrometers confirmed that the generated neutron energy spectrum closely matched Monte Carlo simulation results, validating the neutron source performance. A neutron imaging facility utilizing this cyclotron-based neutron source achieved a spatial resolution of approximately 0.3 mm, demonstrating its capability for various nondestructive testing applications, including defect inspection in industrial components and rotational imaging of cultural artifacts. Additionally, preliminary computational analyses and experimental designs for direct one-step activation analysis verified the neutron irradiation conditions necessary for future experimental validation studies. This study highlights the successful development and promising application potential of the cyclotron-based neutron source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207