MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414110359 · doi:10.1007/s00604-025-07507-0

Evaluation of the efficiency of cyclodextrin polymers as sustainable sampling material for catching palytoxin-like compounds in seawater

2025· article· en· W4414110359 on OpenAlex
Antonella Miglione, C. Melchiorre, Samuela Capellacci, Luciana Tartaglione, Michela Varra, Alex Fragoso, Silvia Casabianca, Mabel Torréns, Jorge Diogène, Antonella Penna, Carmela Dell’Aversano, Mònica Campàs

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrochimica Acta · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Toxins and Detection Methods
Canadian institutionsContinental (Canada)
FundersUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
KeywordsPalytoxinPolymerSeawaterCyclodextrinHuman healthExtraction (chemistry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Palytoxin-like compounds, including ovatoxins, are potent emerging toxins responsible for human respiratory poisonings following inhalation of contaminated marine aerosols. Periodic massive proliferations of the ovatoxin-producing organism (Ostreopsis cf. ovata) worldwide, particularly in the Mediterranean, have caused severe toxic outbreaks, drawing the attention of health authorities. At present, an efficient and sustainable sampling system for monitoring ovatoxins in seawater remains unavailable. Herein, different cyclodextrin (CD) polymers were investigated as a green and effective alternative to conventional and low-performing resins to detect ovatoxins in seawater. Spiking experiments using different concentrations of palytoxin or ovatoxins (namely 200 and 3.3 ng PLTX/mL or 200 ng OVTX-a/mL) were conducted and LC-HRMS was used to evaluate the suitability of CD polymers in capturing palytoxin-like compounds. Several conditions were tested for extracting polymer materials, including different extraction times (1.5 to 4 h), various solvent mixtures (acidic or alkaline), and organic modifiers (methanol or acetonitrile) at different ratios. Among the tested polymers, γ-CD-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) resulted to be the most promising one, providing ovatoxin recoveries in the range 82-108% at a spiking level of 200 ng OVTX-a per mL. The best extracting condition was alkaline pH methanol:water 8:2 mixture, which showed the best palytoxin recovery in both high and low concentration spiking experiments. Finally, a time-dependent increase in the amount of ovatoxins captured by γ-CD-HDI disks deployed in O. cf. ovata cultures was observed. These findings provide valuable insights on the efficiency of passive sampling using CD polymers for capturing ovatoxins during O. cf. ovata bloom events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it