MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414120449 · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2025.09.007

Multiple Amplatzer Vascular Plug III Implantation---Feasible, Safe, and Effective for Paravalvular Leak Closure: Results From a Single-center Registry

2025· article· en· W4414120449 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eliza Adamczyk-Filipek, Andrzej Kułach, Wojciech Wojakowski, Piotr Pysz, Grzegorz Smołka

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeakIncidence (geometry)Adverse effectComplication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Paravalvular leaks (PVLs) can cause heart failure and hemolysis. Transcatheter PVL closure (tPVLc) is a reasonable alternative to surgical repair, particularly in high-risk patients. The complexity of PVL channels makes the selection of an optimal device and technical strategy challenging. In this study we present retrospective registry findings of consecutive tPVLc procedures and evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the multioccluder approach using the Amplatzer ParaValvular Plug III device. METHODS: We analyzed data from 127 consecutive patients with 142 perivalvular leaks (73 para-aortic, 69 paramitral) in whom 152 tPVLc procedures were performed between 2009 and 2023, with 2-4 occluders used to close each PVL. RESULTS: Successful leak closure was achieved in 141 of the 142 leaks, with 131 occluded on the first attempt (technical success 93%) and 10 on the second attempt. Procedural success (technical success and freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCEs]) was achieved in 89% of the patients, whereas incomplete PVL closure was observed in 3% and periprocedural major adverse cardiovascular events in 2 patients. At 1-year follow-up, device dislodgement was noted in 2 patients, and leak reoccurrence - in 4 patients. Eleven patients died. At long-term follow-up (median 25 months, interquartile range 10-40 months), MACCEs occurred in 19 patients, and was associated with mechanical valve leaks (odds ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.3-9.2). Long-term all-cause mortality was 17.6% and was associated with baseline New York Heart Association class. CONCLUSIONS: tPVLc using multiple AVP III occluders is a feasible, safe, and effective strategy for patients with clinically significant PVLs with complex anatomy. Long-term follow-up revealed a low incidence of leak reoccurrence and device-related adverse effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Cardiology→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→