MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414122610 · doi:10.5751/es-16518-300333

Downstream impacts of the Madeira Hydroelectric Complex on várzea traditional agriculture and extractivism

2025· article· en· W4414122610 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guilherme Lobo, Jorge M. Uribe, Emilio F. Morán

Bibliographic record

VenueEcology and Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal and Marine Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Estadual de CampinasUniversity of StirlingFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsHydroelectricityDownstream (manufacturing)HydropowerLivelihoodFlood mythFloodplainAgricultureSustainabilitySustainable development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydropower development in the Amazon has accelerated under public and private incentives, aiming to promote economic growth, environmental conservation, renewable energy, and social equity within a sustainable development agenda. However, recent studies show significant negative impacts on local communities and ecosystems, raising concerns about hydropower’s true contribution to sustainability. Despite increasing awareness, research has largely overlooked the downstream effects of hydropower dams. Since the Madeira Hydroelectric Complex became operational, it has introduced sub-daily flow oscillations (hydropeaking) in the Madeira River, Southwest Amazon. Although poorly understood, hydropeaking can disrupt the river’s essential flood pulse, which rural riverine communities, known as ribeirinho, depend on for traditional flood recession agriculture and extractivism in the whitewater floodplains (várzea). These communities have long adapted their livelihoods to seasonal flood dynamics, using both low- and high-gradient várzea floodplains, but this downstream flow alteration may be affecting the várzea social-ecological system and must be investigated. To investigate hydropeaking’s effects, we conducted semi-structured interviews with local experts (n = 51) of four downstream ribeirinho communities, along with hydrological and soil analyses. Our findings reveal a shift in agricultural practices, particularly in flood recession agriculture in low-várzea areas. Soil analysis corroborates local experts’ concern about declining fertility, showing reduced phosphorus content following dam operations. Additionally, the extreme 2014 flood and expanding illegal gold mining have further diminished engagement in extractivist activities. A truly sustainable future for the Madeira River depends on revitalizing várzea-based value chains while preserving both ecological integrity and social resilience. We recommend establishing an independent monitoring group composed of ribeirinho communities and local scientists to assess downstream impacts on the várzea social-ecological system. Furthermore, targeted compensation and mitigation projects should be implemented to promote the sustainable use of várzea resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcology and SocietySame topicCoastal and Marine ManagementFrench-language works237,207